Practice Forward with

You introduce a new AI tool inside your firm to transcribe meetings and capture action items. And then, in one of your first meetings using it, a client says: “I’m not comfortable being recorded.”

It’s usually said politely. Sometimes even apologetically. But the reaction inside the firm can be immediate and intense.

Partners start wondering whether they’ve moved too fast. Someone asks if recording is even allowed. Another person worries that clients will think the firm is monitoring them or collecting data in ways they didn’t expect. The technology that felt like progress suddenly feels like risk.

Pause. Right. There.

This is not about recording. It’s about communication!

Let’s Start with the Rules

In the United States, call and meeting recording laws generally fall into two categories: one-party consent and all-party consent. In one-party consent states, only one participant in the conversation needs to agree to the recording. In all-party consent states, everyone on the call must consent before the conversation can legally be recorded.

Accounting firms rarely operate inside a single state boundary. A partner may be sitting in Ohio while the client is in California. Another team member may be dialing in from Texas. When conversations cross state lines, you have to default to the stricter standard. That means ensuring that everyone on the call knows the conversation is being recorded and has the opportunity to consent.

The good news is that transparent consent isn’t a new concept. Zoom and Microsoft Teams both display an on-screen notification the moment recording or transcription begins. Participants can see it, and they can discuss it with you if they have concerns. The notification protocol on these platforms helps ensure the recording process is designed to be transparent from the moment recording begins. Third-party notetakers, such as Fireflies or Otter, usually join a meeting as a bot, and how they notify participants varies by tool.

Why Firms Are Beginning to Record Client Conversations

Client conversations typically disappear the moment they end. Often, advisors leave a meeting with a few handwritten notes and maybe send a follow-up email with whatever details they remember later. Team members who join the engagement later have to reconstruct the context from fragmented notes or quick hallway explanations. Details get missed. Follow-ups get delayed. Institutional knowledge walks out the door when a team member changes roles.

Recording and transcription tools allow firms to preserve the substance of important discussions in a way that handwritten notes never could. Instead of trying to type while a client is explaining a complex situation, an advisor can focus fully on the conversation. Decisions, commitments, and next steps are captured automatically and can be referenced later.

The First “No” Often Comes from Inside

More often than not, the biggest resistance to recording comes from you and your team rather than from your clients.

There is concern that asking to record will feel intrusive and prompt negative reactions. As a result, team members may skip the recording because they don’t want to create an awkward moment. But clients are highly attuned to tone and confidence. If you apologize for using AI to help, clients will treat it as something risky. If you speak about it confidently as a service enhancement, they will view it as professional evolution.

This is why firms that successfully adopt conversation intelligence tools focus first on internal alignment.

Introducing Recording to Clients

Don’t wait until the meeting has started to introduce recording. Start before the meeting ever begins. Send a short note explaining that your firm has implemented a transcription tool to improve follow-up and reduce note-taking distractions. Make it clear that its purpose is accuracy and service quality, and that clients can opt out if they prefer.

This does two important things. It removes surprise, and it removes pressure. If resistance still surfaces during the call, stay steady. You don’t need to defend the technology. You simply need to clarify intent.

Explain that the recording allows you to stay fully present, ensures commitments are captured correctly, and helps your team deliver better continuity between meetings. If a client remains uncomfortable, offer flexibility. Ask whether it would help to pause recording during sensitive segments or to use transcription only (no video). And if they still say no? Respect it immediately.

A calm response, such as “That’s no problem. I’ll take notes manually today,” reassures the client that their preferences matter. Consider it a trust-building move and effective communication.

And one “no” is not a “no” forever. Once clients experience clearer summaries and stronger follow-through, their resistance softens naturally. Proof builds comfort.

Increasing Client Comfort with Recording

In many cases, a client’s hesitation has less to do with the recording itself and more to do with uncertainty. Easing those uncertainties will help you get their consent. Here are a few considerations:

1. Clarify how the information is used and protected. Recordings should be treated in the same way as other client information, with strict access controls and clear retention policies. Simply explaining that the recording is used internally to document discussions and improve follow-up can alleviate many concerns.
2. Language matters. Some clients may react strongly to the word “recording” but be comfortable with the idea of transcription or automatically generated meeting notes. Emphasizing purpose rather than technology helps ease uncertainty.
3. Connect the practice to the client’s own experience. Comparing it to an experience the client has already had, such as Microsoft Teams meeting recordings or a Fireflies notetaker, can introduce familiarity and reduce pushback.

The key is to demonstrate that recording is about improving communication and client satisfaction.

The Bigger Shift Happening

Recording client conversations is really about creating value. As AI takes over more routine technical work, the differentiator shifts. Clients aren’t paying for data entry, calculations, or compliance alone. They’re paying for judgment, insight, and the quality of the conversations that help them make better decisions.

That’s why accountants are paying more attention to conversation intelligence tools. These tools do more than create transcripts. They create visibility into moments that have historically been difficult to capture and even harder to scale.

Your opportunity lies in what you do differently once you use them. You can stay present in a conversation instead of taking notes. You and your teams can follow through more consistently. New team members can understand client history faster. And you can learn from your best client conversations and share those practices more broadly.

Recording is not a radical departure from professional norms. It’s simply another form of documentation. The difference is that today’s technology makes that documentation more complete, more accessible, and more useful.

At its core, recording is about clarity. And as you shift toward advisory services, clarity becomes one of the most valuable assets you can create.

Jody Padar, CPA, also known as “The Radical CPA,” is the co-founder of XcelLabs, a training and technology platform that offers solutions to help accountants use AI to build fluency and strategic thinking. Visit XcelLabs for more information.

Backed by the PICPA, XcelLabs is helping CPAs leverage AI to expand advisory capabilities, strengthen firms, and keep the profession future-ready.

Sign up for PICPA’s weekly professional and technical updates by completing this form.

Statements of fact and opinion are the author’s responsibility alone and do not imply an opinion on the part of the PICPA’s officers or members. The information contained herein does not constitute accounting, legal, or professional advice. For actionable advice, you must engage or consult with a qualified professional.